How to answer: “Tell me about a time you had several deadlines at once. How did you decide what to do first?”

How you prioritize when everything seems urgent, whether you communicate early, and whether your method actually protects the most important work.

The answer, step by step

  1. Situation: the deadlines and why they collided.

  2. Your rule for choosing (impact, due time, who was waiting, dependencies).

  3. Actions: the order you worked in and who you updated or asked.

  4. Result: what got done on time and what you renegotiated.

A strong sample answer

Benchmark answer for this question

Fictional example for learning only. It is not your experience; replace every detail with facts that are true for you.

In my admin role at a small accounting office, three things landed on the same Friday: a client report due at noon, payroll inputs due at 3 p.m., and a request from a partner to reorganize the shared calendar. I listed each task with its deadline and who was waiting, then checked with the office manager which one carried the biggest risk if it slipped — payroll could not move. I blocked the morning for the client report, sent payroll inputs by 2 p.m., and moved the calendar task to Monday morning with the partner's agreement. I sent short updates at noon and 2 p.m. so nobody had to chase me. As a result, I met both Friday deadlines and finished the calendar by 10 a.m. Monday. That kind of planning and coordination — deciding the order early and telling people — is how I handle busy weeks.

Why this example works

It shows a clear prioritization rule, early communication and a result tied to that method instead of just claiming to multitask.

  • Sets the scene: “three things landed on the same Friday”
  • Says what YOU did: “I listed each task”, “I blocked the morning”, “I sent short updates”
  • States the result: “As a result, I met both Friday deadlines and finished the calendar by 10 a.m. Monday”
  • Specific, not general: Noon, 3 p.m., 2 p.m., Monday 10 a.m.
  • Connects to the role: Planning and coordination: listing, sequencing and renegotiating one deadline

What you can learn from it

State the criteria you used to choose, who you updated and what happened.

Make it yours — with true details only

Use a real week when tasks overlapped. Name the actual criteria you used (deadline, impact, who was waiting). If something did slip, say so and explain what you renegotiated — that is still a strong answer.

From generic to evidence

Generic: “I'm good at multitasking. When I have many deadlines I just work harder and get them all done.”
With evidence: “I listed the three tasks by deadline and impact, confirmed with my manager that payroll could not move, delivered it early and moved the calendar task to Monday with the requester's agreement.”

Mistakes that cost points

  • “I just multitask” — Explain the rule you used to decide the order
  • Working overtime as the only solution — Show how you prioritized and communicated
  • Not mentioning anyone else — Say who you checked with or updated
  • No outcome — Say which deadlines were met

Before you answer, check

  • Did I explain how I chose what to do first?
  • Did I mention who I updated?
  • Did I say which deadlines were met?
  • Is the planning and coordination clear step by step?

Practise it in your own words

Write your version and get instant, explained feedback. Nothing is stored.

Practise this question

Related questions

All interview answers